Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Daily Market SolutionDaily Market Solution

Investing

Why is China hesitating with the stimulus bazooka? Morgan Stanley weighs in

Investing.com– China’s recent batch of economic support largely disappointed investors holding out for a stimulus “bazooka,â€� with Morgan Stanley stating that Beijing had limited scope to roll out fiscal measures. 

MS analysts wrote in a recent note that China’s biggest economic hurdle remained the debt-deflation loop, and that the government needed to enact more solid measures aimed at boosting consumption. 

“The need of the hour is a package of Rmb10 trillion ($1.42 trillion) geared towards supporting consumption and clearing the property inventory,â€� MS analysts wrote. 

But MS argued that policymakers were hesitant to enact “forceful fiscal easing,â€� with the main point of contention being high public debt levels and declining fiscal revenues. 

MS said Beijing also still held the view that boosting investment was still better than consumption- a trend that was likely to add to excess manufacturing capacity and further deflation. 

China was also likely to see diminishing returns on more investment. 

Beijing announced a slew of stimulus measures in late-September, including lower interest rates, looser property restrictions and more liquidity support for stocks. The government also reiterated its commitment to achieving its 5% annual gross domestic product target, after second-quarter growth missed expectations.

But the measures largely underwhelmed investors clamoring for more targeted, fiscal support. 

To this end, China’s finance ministry said it will hold a briefing this weekend to outline fiscal stimulus measures. 

MS said that any fiscal measures in the near-term were likely to provide limited support, and an ideal scenario would be policymakers targeting GDP growth of 4% to 4.5%, while shifting focus towards reviving consumption and supporting the property market. 

MS said at its current approach, Chinese deflationary pressures would likely increase, as would debt relative to GDP. Such a scenario presented worse returns on investment and would also hurt corporate profits.

This post appeared first on investing.com







    You May Also Like

    Editor's Pick

    Extremist supporters of former president Donald Trump are lashing out online against Usha Vance, the wife of Trump’s running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio),...

    Investing

    Overview Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR,NYSE:UUUU) has been the largest producer of uranium in the United States and an emerging producer of rare earth elements (REEs)....

    Investing

    Investor Insight Silver prices breached $30/oz in the second half of May 2024 as investor demand drove prices to their highest in more than...

    Investing

    Overview Flynn Gold Limited (ASX: FG1) is an Australian mineral exploration company with a portfolio of projects in Tasmania and Western Australia. Tasmania is...

    Disclaimer: Dailymarketsolution.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2024 dailymarketsolution.com